how he did that?

posted May 16th, 2012
How the hell he did that?
http://www.fredericfontenoy.com/Site/Metamorphose.html

It's from 1988, so no photoshop here. Then, how?
posted May 16th, 2012
I have no idea but those are creepy!
posted May 16th, 2012
If I had to guess, I'd guess long shutter speeds while he ran around or whatever, but I really am not sure
posted May 16th, 2012
@ashmy That'd be my guess as well, though there is some really weird stretching going on
posted May 16th, 2012
I look much the same without clothes...
posted May 16th, 2012
Multiple & long exposures, hell of a lot of patience?
It might be interesting to attempt...
posted May 16th, 2012
@grizzlysghost LMAO!

Those are reeeeaaaallly freaky shots, I don't know if it's the stretching or the nekkidness, I think it's the nekkidness that is the most freaky!!!!!!!
posted May 16th, 2012
Slow shutter. Just like lightpainting. And yeah, kinda creepy... o_O
posted May 16th, 2012
Frolicking through the woods nahkid is creepy..but the shots are interesting..
posted May 16th, 2012
They look like scenes from a horror movie. Interesting effect.
posted May 16th, 2012
@grizzlysghost Photographic proof please ;P
posted May 16th, 2012
I agree with @ladyjane - horror movie-esque....
posted May 16th, 2012
Blue smoke and mirrors.
posted May 16th, 2012
God knows but I was surprised to read the 70's equivalent of photoshop the other day, The author in said book explained some multiple exposure shots he had created, and he had used layers by using slides and projectors and then took a picture of the layered images. Cheat!
posted May 16th, 2012
http://www.chilloutpoint.com/art_and_design/16-famous-photoshopped-images-throughout-history.html

If he didn't feel like crawling all over nekkid, he could have done it in the darkroom
lol rest easy photoshoppers
posted May 16th, 2012
Looks like a long exposure to me to.. and a combination of fast movement and "standing" still. But "Photoshop" has exist long before the program did like Binny's @binny examples show. I did learn some cool tricks in the dark room years back... but that was before the digital era ;-)
posted May 16th, 2012
Looks like a distorted person to me which I guess we kind of figured out and I have no idea how they could do that.
posted May 16th, 2012
FOUND IT. (sort of)

From the author's own words:
"In a technical point of vue, this work was done with 24×36 cm argentic film, polaroid’s slides, with a panoramic camera.The exposure time is about 2 secondes, so the mouvement has to be very quick ! It was like a small choreography…”

See here:
http://yeaiknow.com/2012/03/21/frederic-fontenoy/
posted May 16th, 2012
Okay, I only saw the first picture and now I scrolled down the page. Creepy.
posted May 16th, 2012
The funny thing is he says those are self shots. He walks nude in those pics.
posted May 17th, 2012
@grizzlysghost Prove it.

:)
Write a Reply
Sign up for a free account or Sign in to post a comment.