Pearl Crescent?

Probably. Or maybe. There apparently are variations and difficulties in ID'ing some Crescents. From BugGuide, http://bugguide.net/node/view/462350 » “We have a number of shots submitted to BugGuide that don't quite fit the Pearl Crescent (Phyciodes tharos), nor the Northern Crescent (P. cocyta). There is likely a third species, which is still in the process of being defined. This third entity closely resembles both Pearl and Northern Crescents, but is not quite the same as either.”

Confirmed at BAMONA as “Phyciodes tharos” or “Pearl Crescent”; https://www.butterfliesandmoths.org/sighting_details/1129247

Confirmed at BugGuide as “Phyciodes tharos” or “Pearl Crescent”; http://bugguide.net/node/view/1411992

Species pages—
» BAMONA, https://www.butterfliesandmoths.org/species/Phyciodes-tharos
» BugGuide, http://bugguide.net/node/view/411

1 year ago (“Great Spangled Fritillary on mums”): http://365project.org/rhoing/365/2016-06-05
2 years ago (“Damselfly on my clik glasses”): http://365project.org/rhoing/365/2015-06-05
3 years ago (“A Solanum species flower…”): http://365project.org/rhoing/365/2014-06-05
4 years ago (“Little Wood-Satyr”): http://365project.org/rhoing/365/2013-06-05
5 years ago (“Another boring flower photo…”): http://365project.org/rhoing/365/2012-06-05
6 years ago (“Natural spiral…”): http://365project.org/rhoing/365/2011-06-05

[ IMG_6313S9x12Otm :: f/5 :: 1/250" :: ISO-100 :: 55mm ]