Nifty Fifty or Macro or something else?

January 11th, 2012
Am lucky enought to be in a position to buy a new lens. I have a the kit lens that came with my 60D - EFS 17-85 USM. Don't know what I would get most use out of, any advice?
January 11th, 2012
Depends really what you're wanting to take pics of. I have the 18-55mm (my least used), 55-250mm and a macro. My macro is probably used the most, however I'm starting to use the 55-250mm a lot more now. I don't like the 15-55mm much :/ lol.
January 11th, 2012
it really does depend on what you want to shoot..if you need a fast lens the 50mm f/1.8 is very inexpensive, if you want a walk around all in 1 lens there is always the 18-200mm f/4.5

I have 18-55 kit lens and I never use it.
50mm f/1.4 I use it for low light,concerts and portraits is a great fast prime
28-70 f/2.8 is new and I am still getting used to it
18-135 was the kit lens that came with my 60d
and the 18-200 I use the most on my canon t1i (500d) for distance and portraits
January 11th, 2012
Ihave a EFS 17-85mm lens and purchased a 60mm macro lens about a year ago. I love my macro lens so much I am reluctant to take it off the camera!
January 11th, 2012
I think a nifty fifty would give you the greatest bang for your buck... or maybe something like a 100mm f/2.8 macro... (the lens I currently have my eye on!)
January 11th, 2012
50mm lenses are great. Love my Tamron 180 f/3.5 macro. But, unless you wish to buy a third lens, I think a prime might not be the way to go, not as much flexibility.
Think about what you shoot most. From what you shoot currently, I do think you would like a macro, but you would get the most use out of something like a 70-300. Canon have 3 of them. One of the two with image stabilization if your budget allows.
January 11th, 2012
If you do a lot of portrait type stuff, then a 50mm would be great and you could also buy some macro rings (close up rings) that can help out some with Macro. It's not as great as a macro, but will satisfy you until you can save up for the macro lens you want. a 50mm wouldn't be ideal for landscapes, you would want a wider lens. If you are really into macro, I would definitely get a macro lens.

If you want a good walk around lens, I'd take a look at some of the 18-250 or more, if you can afford an L glass version of one of these lenses, then even better.

It all depends on what you want/like to take pictures of.
January 11th, 2012
@pocketmouse I have my eye on that lens too! I was also thinking of an 85mm 1.8 prime.
January 11th, 2012
I personally would buy a 50mm lens (great for portraits) and get a "Reverse Macro" adapter for about $10. This way, you still have the capability of doing Macro shots without spending $500+

Here is a little more about that: http://365project.org/discuss/general/6447/cheap-macro-2-options-reviewed

January 11th, 2012
@onarom That sounds like a plan! Had a look at your other discussion, very helpful. Looked on Amazon but am now confused as to what size I would need- I know I'm so daft! Can you help?
January 11th, 2012
I second @onarom . I would definitely recommend a 50 mm, because it gives you something very different than your kit (i.e. a fast lens). I have the Canon f/1.8, which is around $100 USD. I also have the reverse mount for it (< $10), and it gives you some interesting macro options too.

I was blown away by the sharpness of this lens and am having a lot of fun with it.
January 11th, 2012
toss up between my 50 and my 85:) I have my eye on a 35 as well, but I mainly have my 85 on at the moment
January 11th, 2012
@emmilou - a lot of canon lenses use a 58mm. Look for a "Φ" followed by a number on your lens (like Φ58mm). This is your filter size and also the size of the Reverse Macro adapter that you need.

This is the one I bought: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001G4PA36

January 11th, 2012
@emmilou - actually, it looks like you have a 67mm filter, so this is the adapter that you will need: http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Filter-Reverse-Adapter-Digital/dp/B003Y62FPU/ref=sr_1_4?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1326317996&sr=1-4

January 11th, 2012
@snaggleture The 85 mm is another one I have my eye on. ARGH, so many choices :D
January 12th, 2012
My Canon 50 mm f/1.8 is 52 mm, so I had to buy a separate reverse mount for that one and my kit lens, which was a 58 mm.
January 12th, 2012
@ozziehoffy @ssgeogirl2012 @bluebell @pocketmouse @lilbudhha @jenp @snaggleture @onarom @archaeofrog @4stories @onarom @archaeofrog Wow, so much to think about, thankyou so much. I am leaning towards a 50mm and a reversre adapter, mostly because of cost implictions! Would I be better getting an adapter for the 50mm or my current lens, or both of course? Which lens would give me better reverse macro shots?
Emma
January 12th, 2012
@pocketmouse @snaggleture that's the macro I have... I love it but want to get in even closer!! haha.
January 12th, 2012
@emmilou The adapter will work on both, provided both have a filter size the same size as that of the adapter. I recommend the 18-55 for use with the reversing ring though - from experience I've just found that it's better than the 50mm for reverse lens macro. :)
January 12th, 2012
Since the reverse adapters are so cheap, I just went ahead and bought one for both!
Write a Reply
Sign up for a free account or Sign in to post a comment.