Reverse lens Macro - how to?

April 12th, 2011
Ok, can somebody please give me a rundown on how to do this? What lenses do I use etc?

Cheers
Emma
April 12th, 2011
I use my 18-55mm kit lens and a reverse macro adapter from amazon. I lock it at f/11. Here are 2 samples!



April 12th, 2011
Do you actually need the adaptor?
April 12th, 2011
If you want super sharp images, yes. They're only about $11 on amazon and $4 on ebay. much cheaper than buying a macro lens
April 13th, 2011
@cheriet @triptych_angel Great question, info and results.I will try this!
April 13th, 2011
I use my 50mm and no adaptor. I have some examples in my project if you'd like to check them out.
April 13th, 2011
@kidatheart Do you just turn it around and hold it up? How do you do that? Thanks for any tips. I am very curious and would love to try it.
April 13th, 2011
@triptych_angel I've been wondering about this, too! Thanks for asking the question about it. The past couple days I have thought of trying it by just taking off the lens and turning it around. I would have to hold it (no adapter) so wasn't too sure if that would hurt the camera in any way. Looking forward to reading the answers (:
April 13th, 2011
@cfitzgerald Yep, that's basically it. I find the 50mm fits in the mount, so it's easier to hold steady than the kit lens. You want to have good lighting (natural is best), otherwise it's really difficult. To be honest, I end up with more blurry shots than usable ones, but you do get lucky once in a while. It's all about the trial and error :).

@ca_dev That's how I do it, and so far I haven't had any problems. Just be sure to hold it securely to avoid getting dust on the sensor.
April 13th, 2011
@kidatheart Thanks! I will try it!
April 13th, 2011
@triptych_angel Thanks for this thread? I have been wondering myself. I also just bought macro filters for $13 from Amazon and those have been getting some great close ups too.
April 13th, 2011
@kidatheart Thank you! I'm going to try it. Plus, I'm going to look for an adapter right now (:
April 13th, 2011
@kidatheart COOL,I dusted off my nifty fifty.This will be fun!
April 13th, 2011
I read an article in our outdoor mag - Go ( could possibly find it on the net) Anyway they say take the lens off and remove any polarizing filter from the front , turn it around and hold steady on the camera . Only do it in a controlled environment ie no wind dust etc and then to focus requires rocking back and forth gently while shooting liberally :-)
April 13th, 2011
What is "reverse lens macro"? I dont get it.

@glyn @buccigrossi @ca_dev @cfitzgerald @kidatheart @triptych_angel @cheriet
April 13th, 2011
@calumpit From what I've read and seen, it is when you use a non-macro lens and reverse it in order to take a macro shot. Take the lens off the camera, turn it around and take a photo through what is usually the front of the lens. You have to hold the lens up against the camera body or buy an adapter.
April 13th, 2011
I tried this earlier but could not get anything in focus.
April 14th, 2011
@ca_dev Will it make a better macro? I don't get why you need to turn it around..
April 14th, 2011
@kidatheart I can't get it to shoot because it says it can't find a lens (well, duh... Im holding it on...?)
April 14th, 2011
@nicolekos Hmm, that's really strange. I've never had that problem. I see you shot with a Nikon (I use Canon), I wouldn't think that would affect it, but perhaps?
April 18th, 2011
@calumpit I think it allows you to get closer than if the lens were on properly. I couldn't get it to work for me at all. Couldn't get any focus ): I'm hoping to learn more about this from others on here.
April 30th, 2011
I have just started doing "Reverse Macro" and I have been pretty impressed with the results (using the kit lens- 18-55). My first attempt was a COMPLETE failure but I have definitely improved. Here is what I learned so far:

-you want bright lighting!!! This will allow for faster shutter speeds and less chance of having a blurry photo.
-Start out with a stationary object. A ruler would be a great example of an object that would be able to focus on and give you an accurate idea of the size and focus relationship.
- You will probably want to shoot in full manual mode (I think that you have to do this with Nikon) to have greater control of shutter speeds
- the f-stop will make a difference in the photo, so start out with something in the middle (like 8-11)
-a cheap 'reverse macro adapter' is great for more control, but you can get perfectly sharp photos handheld too. Still, i think the adapter is totally worth the few dollars

This is from hand-holding the lens:


A friends handheld reverse macro shot:



And this using my new $8 reverse macro adapter:


I
April 30th, 2011
Another important aspect about having the inexpensive adapter - it protects your sensor! Doing reverse macro hand-held means that dust and debris can get inside your camera and onto the sensor which could negatively affect your cameras performance.
June 24th, 2011
July 6th, 2011
I just got my adapter in the mail and highly recommend it. Super easy, and it seems extra complicated to be hand-holding both the camera body and the lens.

Here's my first, closest pic ... the back of the Wisconsin quarter ...

July 15th, 2011
It's pretty cool. I have had more bad shots than good ones, but it's worth a try. The trick for me is to hold it tight, firmly, and have lots of lighting. There's a tiny little lever on the lens side that is exposed. I hold that open and it lets in WAY more light. The trick to focusing is to get in REAL CLOSE!! You are only inches or less away from your subject - so you can get some awesome images. I am going to get an adaptor though as I hate having my sensor subject to dust.
Her's some images with reverse macro...


Write a Reply
Sign up for a free account or Sign in to post a comment.