Facebook Shuttering Massive Pages for Violating Photo Copyrights

October 8th, 2012
FB has taken a hard stand on the issue of photo copyright violations. When they have determined someone is doing this, they are swift and thorough in deleting their account. Everything is wiped out, everything. The trend is moving in this direction, as it should.

http://www.petapixel.com/2012/10/08/facebook-shuttering-massive-pages-for-violating-photo-copyrights/#more-78790
October 8th, 2012
A little bit rich coming from facebook, but good!
October 8th, 2012
Boy i could shut a few down with Oscar stolen picture .. from two years ago its still its being ripped off every week .
October 8th, 2012
http://www.thecoolhunter.co.uk/article/detail/1993/for-the-love-of-wood

Here's one of the pages FB shut down This is priceless: "We know of only two infringements – two situations where FB closed our account, and we argue strongly that they were not infringements at all. The problem with this is that you don’t know if what you are posting could irk FB. But even if FB disagrees with the images we posted, are two images enough to kill our account with no chance of recourse?"

Ummm, yes, 2 images are enough.
October 8th, 2012
I do believe FB has drawn the line in the sand and it's going to hurt some people who are reported and found to be uploading photos without permission. It's a game changer and it won't be long when other websites will follow their lead.

As far as I understand FB isn't targeting shared links. Their whole website would be banned if that was the case. In fact, the whole internet.

We've discussed this quite a few times before but the issue is illegal downloading and uploading somewhere else, pinterest.com comes to my mind. Also, hard coding the photo address into a website so the picture shows from it's original location. Links with thumbnails is not the problem.

This has become a huge problem and is a direct result of the internet. Websites are not normally set up to protect uploaded photos. This site isn't either. So, for now, FB has taken the initiative but they are big and time will tell if they are able to control it on their site.

@steveh --- You may finally have some recourse if other sites start policing their accounts.
October 8th, 2012
@dmortega (; maybe , we can only hope .. But somehow I doubt it will ever stop
October 9th, 2012
Just so you know, I'm hearing this applies to videos as well. Even videos set to music that are copyrighted may be an issue.
October 9th, 2012
That took me on an interesting trip. Finished at a web page discussing loss of freedom to take photos.
October 9th, 2012
@tonydebont What was the final page you landed on? Sounds interesting.
October 9th, 2012
@tonydebont Really any limitation on taking pictures of places visible from public access locations should concern us all. There are four refineries and several plants that draw from the refineries in areas that I photograph.
October 10th, 2012
Bev
Does that mean I should delete my hottie collection off FB? That's a bummer!
October 10th, 2012
@prttblues --- Hahaha!!! I guess it would apply. ;-) Put links to the pictures instead of the actual pictures.
October 10th, 2012
Bev
That's too hard to do.... nobody would click them.... that album is the only one that I have that I didn't take the pics or record the videos myself. So I guess I'll remove and apologize to my gals. I don't want my account deleted because of hot actors.
Write a Reply
Sign up for a free account or Sign in to post a comment.