Thinking about a nikon d3000 dslr

February 14th, 2011
whats your opinion? for an ameteur photographer looking to take great qaulity pictures (not interested in professional stuff)
February 14th, 2011
Think again.

This camera was trashed by the photog commnity.

I love Nikon's, but this is heir Edsel, or so I am told. I am sure it does a good job, but there are many better for the price.
February 14th, 2011
I got mine last summer. I love it...
February 14th, 2011
I'm not a professional, far from it, and I've got the d5000. It's a step up for not much more money. And I love it! It's just fun to play with, and still get great results. That's just my opinion though.
February 14th, 2011
i've had mine for about a year now....and i love it.....takes some great pictures....
February 14th, 2011
@moncooga thanks what excatly is bad about it? @sdpace do you have any problems with it at all? @sarahbear9995 I'm on a tight budget lol I wonder what this one would be in comparsion to yours
February 14th, 2011
@dkg thanks Idk what I should do. Have you had any problems?
February 14th, 2011
From what I am told...you are very limited for the money you spend. You cannot "grow into it". It is already obsolete. The flash sync is terrible.Video...who cares. It will become a shelf display in no time.

Save for a D5000, or a D7100.
February 14th, 2011
i haven't had any problems....i'm just an amateur and just starting to learn....
i did some research before buying it and i had read that this was a good beginner dslr.....
February 14th, 2011
My husband did most of the research, but we just got a D5000, and before I had a D40. Loved them both.
February 14th, 2011
@moncooga - hahaha, edsel! What a great reference. There is one for same near my parents in NY. It is fairly cheap, in great shape, and amazingly cool. But its an edsel. :-P
February 14th, 2011
@bsingleton0010 i havent had any problems at all -- except when i forget my memory card. : / the only drawback I would say is that if you're used to a point and shoot, there is no "on-screen" viewfinder on the D3000...you have to use the eyepiece (Nikon calls this "live view." I think the D5000 does have that feature though.
February 14th, 2011
@apepper The D3000 replaced the D40. The D40 is a great camera, and has better image capabilities that the D3000 for the money. Megapixels? Who cares. I have a 10 mp D40x, and prefer my 2.74mp D1H over it hands down.

Megapixels is the only improvement the D3000 has over the D40, and the D40 has better flash sync, which is , at least to me, more important.

I am not a fan of a still camera being able to shoot video. Big deal. I have a P&S that can do that well for $84.
February 14th, 2011
Look into the d3100 instead.
February 14th, 2011
@moncooga okay compared to a nikon coopix l110... this has got to be a step up right? lol
February 14th, 2011
@dkg thats what i'm looking for.
February 14th, 2011
@sdpace thanks I'm new to dslr (as in never even picked one up lol) @christi2705 @apepper thanks for your input
February 14th, 2011
@bsingleton0010
i have it, and it serves it's purpose well as a starter's camera. for its price, i'm quite happy with the images, plus it is very light (i lugged one around a 16km run to take pictures of the other runners, without any discomfort). while it certainly does give you good enough pictures, there are some options that are missing (google has a repository for them).

but as you said that you're not into the pro stuff, this may very well be the camera for you. however, add a little more to your budget and you can get the D3100 (same camera but with HD video capability and LiveView) or the D5000 (HD video, LiveView which works well with its tilting screen---very handy for experimental shots or difficult angles). hth. :D
February 14th, 2011
@nellycious so the d3000 doesnt shot hd video? If thats the case then I will proly go with the d3100
February 14th, 2011
@bsingleton0010 that's right. it's a very basic camera really. the D3100 might just be your best bet then. :D
February 14th, 2011
I got one back a few months ago and I LOVE IT. No it doesnt shoot video but I have taken some beautiful shots with it.
February 14th, 2011
my vote is D90, it can use the older lenses as well as the newer lenses. it also shoots video, and has live view. i have one and really enjoy it, and being able to use more lenses than the newer ones is a plus.
February 14th, 2011
The D3000 had horrible reviews... for good reason from what I've heard. Can't say from experience, only consumer level camera of Nikon I have experience with is the D70 and D80. D3100 replaced it. I'd opt for either that one, or something else (don't be scared of used!)
February 14th, 2011
@nellycious i think so lol
February 14th, 2011
@annlessner @cchambers @hmgphotos thanks everyone I think I may have made up my mind the d3100 sounds pretty good to me!
February 14th, 2011
I bought it when it came out, and got rid of it pretty fast - I thought it was a rubbish camera.
February 14th, 2011
@blightygal d3000 or d3100
February 14th, 2011
@bsingleton0010 Sorry, the D3000 :-)
Write a Reply
Sign up for a free account or Sign in to post a comment.