Is this photo disturbing?

March 2nd, 2012
My dad and my friend both separately told me that they find this image disturbing, which I found surprising - it's only trees reflected in water after all! What does anyone else think?
March 2nd, 2012
disturbing in what way? not to me
March 2nd, 2012
nope not to me...its interesting..x
March 2nd, 2012
I don't think so... I think it's quite pretty actually!
March 2nd, 2012
I think it's wicked! I love rippled reflections :)
March 2nd, 2012
Not in the least bit, very strange thing to say!
March 2nd, 2012
I agree. I see nothing wrong with it. Why did they find it disturbing?
March 2nd, 2012
No.
March 2nd, 2012
I don't get disturbing from this at all - and disturbing is one of my favorite photographic subjects, so I know disturbing. :) It's most def cool, though!
March 2nd, 2012
Not really but it does remind me of a "Dali-esque" type painting.
March 2nd, 2012
i thinks it's beautiful! not disturbing at all!
March 2nd, 2012
Not at all, great shot..
March 2nd, 2012
I agree with @krissym - it is a bit' Dali' and some people find his work unnerving. I like it.
March 2nd, 2012
LOL! I was scared to look! No, it is gorgeous, maybe they think it looks like a scary movie?
March 2nd, 2012
No way it is a great rsflctive shot
March 2nd, 2012
No, it's a lovely picture.
March 2nd, 2012
Not to me. I love the ripples. I feel it makes it interesting.
March 2nd, 2012
AAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

somebody hold me.

kidding... this is a disturbingly wicked awesome shot!
March 2nd, 2012
No, it reminds me of an artist, not Dali though, I'll have a think!! : )
A cross between van Gogh and Edvard Munch. : )
March 2nd, 2012
No, it's not disturbing to me, but that's the interesting thing about art and the perspective of the viewer- it's subject to change depending on who's doing the viewing!
March 2nd, 2012
@peeliks @bec01 @melissapike @starburst @runningbk @dmortega @miley89 @beautifulthing @krissym @harley84 @achilleos @humphreyhippo @scrappy @hobgoblinwychwo @paulavdmerwe @egad @grecican @lorraineb

Lol!! Thanks everybody! Not disturbing after all... phew (I wasn't aiming for disturbing so that's good!) :)
March 2nd, 2012
I don't see anything disturbing, it's a beautifully captured reflection!
March 2nd, 2012
As a photographer, no I see the beauty.
I get how they see it as disturbing though. It is the fairy tale scary movie thing. The picture shows good movement and stretched out trees. That equals scary enchanted forest.
March 2nd, 2012
Not disturbing but strange. Slight dizzy feeling with the upside down.
March 2nd, 2012
I'm confused. Did they change their minds?
March 2nd, 2012
Can someone post a truly disturbing photo? I was hoping for disturbing but this is just a cool photo.
March 2nd, 2012
Disturbing? Perhaps scientifically. I surmise they mean it looks like sperm swimming. Seriously.
March 2nd, 2012
I don't see how it could be disturbing. I find it interesting.
March 2nd, 2012
Maybe all of us are disturbed. :-) I think that this is very pretty
March 2nd, 2012
Nope, it's beautiful!
March 2nd, 2012
I think the water is disturbed, but disturbing? Nope.
March 2nd, 2012
@5unflow3r , haha......well said:)
@lauralatham , I think it's great!
March 2nd, 2012
Lol, I didn't find it disturbing in a bad way, just gave me a funny feeling to look at it. Maybe it was the dizzy feeling mentioned by Paul Godfrey or maybe it is just the rippling movement playing tricks with my mind. Whatever it was it is strange that both I and your Dad both felt 'something' when looking at it. Ann H. LeFerve is right with what she says about the perspective of the viewer. Great discussion thread Laura.
March 2nd, 2012
I don't find it at all disturbing, I think it's very cool!
March 3rd, 2012
disturbing - maybe if your on an acid trip, then most things would be disturbing, but this??!!
March 3rd, 2012
I don't get disturbingness from this shot. xD I think it's cool!
March 3rd, 2012
i'm confused by there reaction - in what way disturbing - i thinks its rather pretty
March 3rd, 2012
I don't get why they say it's disturbing. ???? I'll have to read thru the comments here to see if you say "why" they said that. Did they tell you?
March 3rd, 2012
It reminds me of Arthur Rackam's slightly scary, beautiful illustrations for fairy tales, the same expressives twists of line which give the drawings an out of this world feeling.
March 3rd, 2012
Sorry, I meant Rackham.
March 3rd, 2012
no
March 3rd, 2012
I think its pretty cool.
March 3rd, 2012
no... it's a bit eerie... and like someone else said, remniscent of something out of a fairytale... but not "disturbing"... to me, "disturbing" is a value-laden word that goes beyond expressing the feeling of an image... my litmus test is this: if an image is "disturbing", one should think twice before showing it to one of my boys... if an image is merely creepy, spooky or eerie, i would definitely show it to them because i'm sure they'd get a kick out of it...
March 3rd, 2012
I wish I'd taken it, lol.
March 3rd, 2012
I think it's totally wild -- love it!
March 3rd, 2012
I agree with Karen H and northy. Not disturbing but Mystical, eerie. The trees look as if they could tell a few tales though!!..:-)
March 3rd, 2012
@catwoman2 I know exactly what you mean about Arthur Rackham's illustrations and the stories were quite scary - I wonder whether that is what it made my dad think of, as he would have read them too!

@kimcrisp did you read those too?
March 6th, 2012
I think you have a great eye for seeing things many people would overlook!!
Very nice Laura! (No it isn't disturbing!)
March 6th, 2012
I don't think it looks disturbing
April 13th, 2012
It's pretty! A bit eerie but not disturbing.
April 14th, 2012
I think it is interesting and unique...
April 14th, 2012
Eerie yes
April 14th, 2012
As Laura's Dad may I explain why I said I found the photo "disturbing"?

First I like the photo!

When you see an image for the first time the brain tries to classify it in the first few seconds.
I see Laura's photo and by brain says

It's trees - but NO it can't be trees as the image wiggles.
So are these thing roots then - but no it's a reflection
But NO AGAIN as a reflection would be the other way up.

So my brain gets confused or "disturbed"

Another thing that does this the the brain is the line drawings of M C Escher and the link below should take you to one.
http://visualfunhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/mc_escher_063.jpg
April 14th, 2012
@lauralatham
As Laura's Dad may I explain why I said I found the photo "disturbing"?

First I like the photo!

When you see an image for the first time the brain tries to classify it in the first few seconds.
I see Laura's photo and by brain says

It's trees - but NO it can't be trees as the image wiggles.
So are these thing roots then - but no it's a reflection
But NO AGAIN as a reflection would be the other way up.

So my brain gets confused or "disturbed"

Another thing that does this the the brain is the line drawings of M C Escher and the link below should take you to one.
http://visualfunhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/mc_escher_063.jpg
April 21st, 2012
Disturbing is the wrong word to use.
April 22nd, 2012
It's strange for sure.

Confusing to the eyes. I find a lot of HDR shots disturbing to the brain as they seem to focus on everything at once!
April 23rd, 2012
beautiful!!
Write a Reply
Sign up for a free account or Sign in to post a comment.