Which Macro Lens... (Canon)

November 18th, 2010
Hey Folks,

I'm after a macro lens as I'm looking forward to taking those gorgeous floral close ups and I'm a big fan of insects... so which lens. Do I buy a prime lens for macro, if so what mm? Has anyone got one they're really happy with or not happy with and wish to share your thoughts, so I have a better idea of what to look for and what to avoid?

Really appreciate any advice or hot tips on where to buy a cheap one!!

Cheers
Kx
November 18th, 2010
I have a Sigma and I hate it. It has focusing problems if you want to use the auto focus, it just doesn't work. I wind up using my add on Quanaray +10 inexpensive macro lense instead most of the time. And I've heard complaints on other forums about the Sigma macro lenses too. I wish I had not relied on the camera store for advice...
November 18th, 2010
@justkariherself ooh, ta chuck... i was toying with Sigma as I've got the 10-20mm, which has been ok?!
November 18th, 2010
I own a Nikon D80 and use the Sigma 105mm macro lens. It's ok, but in my opinion, it lacks sharpness. I never use auto focus for macro shots. I always focus manually. However, the sharpness is what puts me off most. Nikkor macro lenses are much sharper (and much more expensive, too) :-} My next macro lens will definitely be the Nikkor. As to Canon, I'm not sure what is the best option.
November 18th, 2010
I bought Koshi the EF-S 60mm macro lens, and it works very well. It's also good value for money. It won't work on a full frame (35mm) body though, so if you plan to upgrade to one later you should steer clear of any EF-S glass and stick to EF. The EF 50mm f/2.5 compact macro is really good (I use one for my less-creative photographic responsibilities). I like the 60mm a bit better, though. If you have some extra cash you can't go past the EF 100mm f/2.8 L IS USM macro. Love that lens, and it is high on my list of lenses to buy.
November 19th, 2010
For a fun and inexpensive macro, you can get a reverse ring and mount your existing lenses backwards. My 18-55 kit lens takes pretty good macros mounted backwards - and it only cost $12.
The colors on this one are kind of boring - I was too late for bright flowers and shot seed heads instead. http://static.365project.org/1/591218_bchjkmnpuz_s.jpg
November 19th, 2010
Here is the link from Amazon. Just choose your camera body and the filter size of the lens you want to use. The ring fits into your camera body like a regular lens, then you screw your lens to to ring like you are putting on a filter. You can zoom and manually focus the lens, but everything works backwards, so it takes a little practice - and a tripod.
http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Filter-Reverse-Adapter-Digital/dp/B001G4PA36/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1290124972&sr=8-2
November 19th, 2010
I've got their 105mm 1:2.8 DG Macro and its specifically their macros that I've heard complaints about. The problem is is not just a macro and winds up setting itself on infinity focus all the time, I'm not good right now at, manual focus because I need to get glasses updated badly. So I rely on the auto focus a lot for quick moving bugs and such. Its so indecisive with focusing, lense going in and out and in and out over and over before it settles on infinity, that the bugs long gone before I get a picture. I keep going back to it and keep coming away frustrated.
November 19th, 2010
I have the Canon 60mm f2.8 and image is pretty good. I'm looking to trade it for a 100mm f2.8 only because I need a little more distance from the subject specially when taking pictures of insects.
November 19th, 2010
I LOVE my Canon 60mm! I did test the off brand ones before I bought and they just didn't compare.

I take a lot of pictures with this lens and that includes most of the flower shots on my page, as well as most of my insect shots, and all of my water drop shots.
November 19th, 2010
The Tamron 90mm f/2.8 Di is crazy sharp for about $400. Check out this flickr group - http://www.flickr.com/groups/tamronsp90/pool/

Tamron also has a newer 60mm f/2.0 macro as well. I've heard good things about it, but I haven't used it.
November 19th, 2010
I have the 100mm canon F2.8 and love how fast it is at focusing . Im only new to the macro world but i do love the results from this lens.







heres some shots ive done with the 100 mm. I yet to try this lens out on ppl , because ive been told its a great portrait lens.
November 19th, 2010
What jinx said - I use the 60 mm macro and quite like it ... I'm just wating for him to buy me the 100 mm though ;)
November 19th, 2010
I have just seen an article of macrolens´s. If you buy a 50 mm you have to be pretty close to the subject (8 cm). With a 105 mm you have 24 mm to the object and with a 180 mm, 47 cm. In the article the talk about Sigma, Tamron and Canon. They recommand Tamron or Canon.

Have you tried close up lenses?
November 19th, 2010
I bought the tamron 90mm f2.8 for canon recently and I am very happy with it! ( http://www.the-digital-picture.com/reviews/Tamron-90mm-f-2.8-Di-Macro-Lens-Review.aspx) Does what it says on the box and absolutely no issues with sharpness/focus speed or anything else.
Write a Reply
Sign up for a free account or Sign in to post a comment.