macro extension tube vs macro filters

March 1st, 2011
I desperately want a macro lens for my Canon, but that is not happening anytime soon. So, I was wondering, which works better macro extension tubes or macro filters? Do you use either? Which one is the best bang for my buck? Thanks for any advice you have!
March 1st, 2011
I don't know about macro filters but I use macro tubes all the time and love them. They can be a bit fiddly to start out with but you can get some great results
March 1st, 2011
I have a macro extension tube. I inherited it along with a couple of manual lenses. I really like it and I am starting to use it more and more. I have never used a macro filter so I can't say anything about one vs the other though.. Don't know if that helps at all...
March 1st, 2011
Heya, We have Kenko extension tubes... i used to hate them... but i've come to love them... yes a macro lens would be nice but no money tree in our yard (ok so balcony not yard! LOL)... anyhow... i've never used a macro filter though so cant compare...
i've got a few photos in my albums at the moment that i've used the extension tubes for - all my bubble/fizzy photos, one my hair and my husbands eye lashes... and nearly everything in @dcr 's album (my other half) he has used the extension tubes with our 50mm lens.
March 1st, 2011
Go with the tubes. The problem with a macro filter is it's another piece of glass on top as opposed to the filters extend the lens. I have a macro lens and on occasion will use the tubes as well.

Have fun!
March 1st, 2011
Another vote to extension tubes (ET),

note:
there are 2 type of ET. With electric contact and without electric contact. Mine (Kenko ET) have electric contact, which is allow me to connect with my lens. Fully control of lens' aperture is possible. No optic within so no image quality degradation...
March 1st, 2011
I have the Kenko extension tubes and have been having so much fun with them - as a bonus, the three photos I had on the popular page last month were done with the tubes! Eventually, I hope to get a macro lens, but for now these have been well worth what I paid for them.

Have fun and update us if you get them so we can see what you find with them! :)
March 1st, 2011
@silverhorn @shadesofgrey @sam_cr @sueb @wahyusp @michellepj Thank you so much for responding! I have been leaning toward the tubes and so this helps a lot! Thank you! Also, thank you for the information you all gave about the tubes you use. Now, I know what to research and what to pass along to my hubby. We have an anniversary coming up and am hoping to score a photography based present. :0) Thanks again!!!! I will keep you updated!!!
March 1st, 2011
I have the same question, so thanks for posting this question - and thanks everyone for the answers! Now I know what to start with. One question though - how much would the extension tubes cost??
March 2nd, 2011
if u already have a macro ..... go for extension tubes.... but if u dont have a macro, go for macro filters....
March 2nd, 2011
@hillsgirl It seems like they are anywhere between $80 and $180. I'm still researching to find the difference. I do hope to get some soon!

@gavincci Thanks for the tip. I honestly want it all!
March 2nd, 2011
I also go for Extension tubes its more sharper and less distortions. But if you really want and love macro you can but second hand lens on ebay maybe which are also cheap specially the manual macro lenses. You can also explore on Macro Reverse Ring for Reversing your lens mount making the lens macro, its cheaper than the 2 options above.
March 2nd, 2011
Cat
Tubes are the best option out of the two, love em! I use it on both my macro lens and my 50mm :) works perfect on both, the filters tend to cause a little too much distortion from what I can tell :) Happy hunting :)
March 2nd, 2011
I use the filters. They are cheap and I've had great results (check my album)
March 2nd, 2011
I have a canon extension tube, works really well. Means I don't have to have a filter for each of my lenses the way filters would require. I'd love a proper macro lens, but just can't justify the price even though I do a lot of close up shots.

With my cheap 50mm lens the auto focus tends to be very slow, but that lens is slow to focus anyway and I tend to just shoot manual with it. They do reduce the amount of light, not sure if filters do too.
March 2nd, 2011
As Samantha mentioned I use a full set of Kenko tubes for basically all of my shots. They did take a bit of getting used to with the very shallow DoF, but once you get used to that you can get some very solid results. You'll need a good light source as well!

That said though I've seen some great results with Raynox macro conversion lenses.

Good luck!
March 3rd, 2011
@ericmabalot Thanks for the advice! I will look into all your suggestions. Thanks again!

@jessicapena Thanks!

@meshinka Thanks, I will look at your album.

@neda Thank you!

@dcr Thanks for your response and another brand. I appreciate all of the help!

THANK YOU ALL FOR TAKING THE TIME TO HELP ME! Can't wait!
March 4th, 2011
I hope you have fun with whatever you get! I just have a reverse adapter ring, it only cost $7 :)
March 4th, 2011
@carebear Cool! I bet I will get one of those sooner than anything else!!! Thanks!!!
Write a Reply
Sign up for a free account or Sign in to post a comment.