Is This Right?

I thought the Roman numeral four was IV. I have never noticed this before. Not exactly a stellar shot for the weekly theme.

[Deb]

LOL! Curiouser and curiouser . . . . I have an interesting link :D
http://www.ubr.com/clocks/frequently-asked-questions-faq/faq-roman-iiii-vs-iv-on-clock-dials.aspx

[katy]

@deburahiru Very interesting , Deb. I really appreciate the research. I had just recently noticed it on more than one clock!

[Gillian]

Great entry for the weekly theme. I've seen this a few times in the past and always wondered about the IIII vs IV ;)
Fascinating link, Deb @deburahiru Thanks!

[Deb]

@kwiksilver I had never noticed the difference before, so had to look into it :D

[katy]

@kwiksilver Thanks so much, Gillian. thanks to @deburahiru now we know!

[J. Voorberg]

great ..another fact that I will now have to keep in my small overloaded brain..lol..lol....lol....lol..(that's IIII of them)

[katy]

@jayberg LOL! You are so funny!