roof lines 2

I've tried to use the software to remove an architectural distortion which meant both vertical roof lines were out of kilter. But, in doing that, I think I've introduced other problems... Hey ho, it's all a learning curve...

The original shot is here
http://365project.org/peadar/365/2012-08-15

[Johanna]

Honestly, I think I do prefer the unedited version. I have no idea if it makes any sense, but it looked more natural. It's such a fine difference. But if you learned stuff tackling the distortion, it was all well worth it! :)

[Danny G.]

I like the unedited version better, Peter. But post processing is an adventure all to itself, the learning never stops. I am a mere novice in post but one thing I have learned is a little post goes a long way.

[Fanny Brogden]

Well!! I'm very impressed!! Couldn't do that on pic monkey and i haven't graduated any further, so hats off to you Peter great job!! :))

[Rachel Holbrook]

I also prefer the unedited version :-)
Maybe it looks more natural for the eye?
I have not yet graduated past cropping, so any post pic processing is impressive to me!

[Peter H]

@joa @soboy5 @fannyb @rvm Thanks, everyone. I'm with you, the unedited version is more natural!

[Damian Powell]

The unedited one definitely looks more natural, but for some reason, I am drawn to this one. The edit makes it more graphic. Perhaps I have a perverse sense of aesthetic.