Painting Buster Before and After by olivetreeann

Painting Buster Before and After

I'm posting this by request of @prttblues. She was curious to see what the "Painting Buster" shot looked like before I processed it in Befunky. So here it is Bev!

The only reason I posted the processed version was that I'd already posted an unprocessed version when I did the film challenge and I'd had fun testing out the "artsy" effects in Befunky. In a sense it was a filler. So, just out of curiosity...suppose the unprocessed had never been posted. Which one would you prefer? I think I would have posted the unprocessed. What would you do?
I like the befunky editing
March 17th, 2012  
I vote befunky too. I am an "editing" addict at times. But I think the edit makes everything stand out....the hay bale and the windows in the back wall too! So...befunky it is. How do you do this befunky? I want to try it!
March 17th, 2012  
I am a realist...so I like the before. But that's just my preference. I'm sorry I've not been commenting as much. I'm still here...and trying to get back on track.
March 17th, 2012  
@kimmistephens Thanks Kimmi!
@espyetta Thanks MaryBeth! It's Befunky.com - an online photo editing site just like iPiccy and Picnik. They have a section called "artsy" effects and this one is I think "oil painting". But there are quite a few to choose from. Of course if you're willing to pay a little more, there are hundreds!!
@mrssmith Thanks Carla! Don't worry, I haven't forgotten you! You'll get back when you can. Praying for you.
March 17th, 2012  
i'm not so keen on processing so i would have posted the unprocessed. but having said that, the good thing about processing is that it brings out the details and texture of the subject. very nice, ann.
March 17th, 2012  
I like the unprocessed
March 17th, 2012  
@summerfield Thanks Vikki- I did post the unprocessed one first (for the film challenge) and basically prefer the "natural" shot. But I did like what this effect did for the shot- especially the detail of the grass and hay as well as how it warmed up the earth tones and made them a little more distinct. But when viewed large, it doesn't even look like a photo anymore, so I would stick with the original.
@kerristephens Thank you Kerri!
March 17th, 2012  
The editing is cool, but I do like the original
March 17th, 2012  
I like the unprocessed. In fact, except for those steps I associate with film processing (contrast, saturation, etc.) I almost always prefer the unprocessed. I do find myself wishing more people would rotate their shots - I like horizons to be horizontal.
March 17th, 2012  
I couldn't decide.. details are great on the befunky and the vintage feel on the unprocessed is soothing.. I like them as they are.. side by side.. =)
March 17th, 2012  
good idea
March 17th, 2012  
@digitalrn Thanks Rick!
@dmariewms Thanks Marie! The shot that I posted for the film challenge was horizontal. This was a second shot of the scene. I was just using it for the fun of processing.
@inertie Thanks Inertia! It does make a nice before and after collage.
@sarasdadandmom Thanks Terry. This was actually done as a request, not something I was planning to do, but it was a good way to show the difference between the processed and unprocessed photos.
March 18th, 2012  
I was not trying to sound critical, and hope it didn't come out that way. It's just a preference.
March 18th, 2012  
@dmariewms No, it didn't- don't worry. I don't usually shoot a lot of verticals- but like I said, I used this one to fool around with the processing; not because it was a good shot. It's not bad, but my first choice was the one I used in the film challenge (The Grand Old Lady series) and that was the horizontal version which I thought was better.
March 18th, 2012  
Interesting - it doesn't look as different as I expected it to (probably viewing on a bigger screen would help). I really like the rustic look of the original - the processing brings a different feel to it, but it doesn't feel excessive. Cool!
March 18th, 2012  
@beachradish Thanks Beachradish. The March 15th shot is the processed version a little larger (since it is the only version posted on that date). The effect made it look like it had been painted with a heavier brush stroke- oil painting style. It's most evident in the grass and on the bale of hay.
March 18th, 2012  
@prttblues I wanted to make sure you saw this!
March 18th, 2012  
Leave a Comment
Sign up for a free account or Sign in to post a comment.