52Frames Challenge - Bokeh

but is it a bokeh if there is nothing in the foreground?
I decided against this photo for the bokeh challenge.

[Ellen Bogenschutz]

Ha! I didn't know you were doing 52Farmes...what's your nick name there?

[Joan Robillard]

Lovely-That's my noncommital comment

[John Falconer]

Nice shot.

[Rob Z]

LOL - I love your question. And, not being very technically knowledgeable, I had to Google Bokeh. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh#Etymology It was so interesting. So, I guess the answer is yes, but the question is "why". To my eye it just doesn't seem right somehow. Thanks for doing this - it was fascinating. :)

[Phil Howcroft]

hmm difficult question Corinne , yes it is, but it needs a subject in the foreground , in focus , to showcase the dreamy bokeh

[Mags]

I like the shapes and colors!

[Kathy]

I think that one can have a photo of bokeh. I might include a little more bokeh, even filling the frame.

[Christine Sztukowski]

It reminds me of imc

[Ann H. LeFevre]

I always think of bokeh in terms of sunlight through leaves on trees. This makes me think more of something out-of-focus. But my definition of bokeh may not be the correct one.

[winghong_ho]

It is a good question. I have never tried it.

[Brian]

Hmm

[Corinne C]

@theredcamera @briaan @wh2021 @olivetreeann @365projectorgchristine @randystreat @marlboromaam @phil_howcroft @robz @johnfalconer @joansmor @theredcamera
Thank you all for taking time to comment.
I believe after all that my picture is just a blurry one and that to get a bokeh you need shining light but this is my own interpretation 😉
I posted this picture on 52Frames for the bokeh challenge because I really liked its colors but I am certainly off subject. Thanks again!

[haskar]

Love it. Fav.